Would you love to get completely irrelevant traffic from Google's organic search results? How about absolutely no traffic at all? Or zombie traffic that doesn't do anything?
Get rid of that pesky, high converting traffic that floods in via relevant keywords and drives revenue, builds authority and trust, and generally makes life easier. I can even show you how to have ad placeholder pages outrank your own site for a search on your own domain.
Sucking at search is super easy, and you can start right now without any practice. But don't take our word for it, check out the evidence...
Exhibit A: Content keywords
If you have a Google Webmaster Tools (sorry, Search Console) account, you'll be able to mosey on down there to check out a host of interesting metadata about your site.
One important feature shows a list of the most common keywords contained onsite. This is useful because, if it is way off, it could be a strong indicator that Google is not able to index your site properly - or you've been hacked.
Luckily for me, mine seems to be perfectly accurate:
As you can see, SME Pals (a blog devoted to helping entrepreneurs and small business owners thrive online) has the following keywords:
You, like us, might be fooled into thinking that given the above distribution of keywords we are a blog covering business, marketing, and ideas. Of course, Google's having none of this.
Exhibit B: Search analytics
A quick glance at our search analytics (also in Search Console), shows the keywords driving the most impressions:
Ok, so that's not really ideal. Google seems fixated on driving SEO software related traffic to us. Well, not traffic per se... impressions. In fact it's been this way for 2 years now.
I wondered how there could be such a huge bias to two relatively unimportant keywords, 'seo' ranking 12th, and 'software' (which doesn't rank in the top 20 keywords).
Exhibit C: Related sites
I used the related search operator to find out what sites Google thinks SME Pals is related to:
Uhh, ok; a bunch of SEO apps and software sites. That makes sense given the impressions shown in the search analytics report. Although, it doesn't really seem to gel with Google's own assessment of the actual content of the site.
It gets even weirder.
Exhibit D: Old domains
Over the years, the domain of this site has changed as the focus changed from supporting the tech books I was writing to talking more about business. Those old domains have since been snapped up by some enterprising domain squatter (so there are no lingering 301 redirects, etc), and now look like this:
Here's the interesting part. Up until about a month ago, if you searched for smepals.com in Google, that site (siteprebuilder.com) would appear in first place in the SERPs.
It took Google only a year and a half to start returning SME Pals in first place. I'll confess my disappointment that Google wasn't able to pick up this change just a smidge quicker. In fact, you can see a 3 month conversation I had with the good folks over at Google's webmaster help forums towards the beginning of the year (hint: click on the screenshot to read more):
Let me be the first to say:
You have to really suck at writing if Google is going to stubbonly return an ad placeholder in first place for a search on your own domain.
Exhibit D Part 2: Old domains
Siteprebuilder wasn't the only previous domain we had over the last 7 years or so (trust me, I tried my best to find a good one that wasn't parked). Another domain name, WSM4B.com, has also long ago been parked by a domain squatter:
I guess I should be thankful that at least Google wasn't returning both the old domains above SME Pals, right? Sure, especially since Google still relates WSM4B with a host of great blogs and sites:
Hmm. So being an ad placeholder means Google will automatically associate you with high value properties, for years on end without change.
So what's my point?
The thing is, I'm not even mad.
This is not a gripe about lost traffic and earnings. This is a concern about Google's methods.
It may be that this blog genuinely sucks and that Google should avoid sending traffic to it at all costs. Fine, I'll accept that. But, what's not fair is the complete lack of transparency. I can't tell if the site is penalized, or if this is how Google should behave.
There is absolutely nothing we can do (and by extension, small businesses for whom things may be far less funny) to even begin to understand what the issue is.
We spent 3 months on the webmaster forums and got some great help (a shout out to Ashley who really put in some time and effort) to no avail. Ultimately, one of their top contributors kicked the issue upstairs (to whom we may not know) and that was that - nothing more came of it.
Under these circumstances, it's far better to actually be a spammer than a genuine blogger because at least a manual penalty tells you something; gives you a recommendation, a course of action. Anything's better than not knowing.
Should Google have to explain every little swing in their rankings? Of course not. But should they be able to give some clarity, some tiny nugget of information, to help businesses who may be trying their best? Probably.
After two years of this bizarre seo software organic traffic, we're quite proud of our accomplishments. I mean how many of you can say that Google likes ad placeholder pages more than your site?
And, once those domains have become ad placeholders, Google suddenly holds them in high esteem (for years on end), right up there next to authority sites in your own niche (Note: this is an advanced technique, so don't feel bad if you can't replicate it on your own site straight away).
If you'd like to learn how to optimize your site for search like this, don't hesitate to drop me a line in the comments. No doubt Google will melt your face off for commenting here and send your site traffic based on 'goat wrangling strategies' for the next fifteen years.
But seriously, if you've experienced something like this I'd be interested to hear your story. Not least of which because I assume that, like us, you've decided to try Google proof your business.
Share your tips and experiences in the comments.